patching...
Update: Keep up with news from Fort Hunt and the region with the free Patch email newsletter. Learn more here! »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Scott Surovell's Roots Run Deep in 44th

Incumbent Democrat’s to-do list includes fixing Route 1, promoting green initiatives, and adding more preschools.

Scott Surovell became the delegate to Virginia’s 44th District almost by accident two years ago, when then-incumbent Democrat Kristen Amundson, in office since 1999, changed her mind about running after winning her primary.

The House Minority Leader contacted Surovell. “He said he needed me to run,” said Surovell, a lawyer who quickly decided he could translate his legal know-how and understanding of the area he grew up in into serving in the General Assembly. He put a campaign into gear. He went on to win the seat less than five months later with 53.4 percent of the vote in a three-person race.

He didn’t stop running when he hit Richmond for his first term, introducing bills and as a minority freshman, even seeing some pass, he said. Some of his top legislative accomplishments were creating licensing requirements for home-energy auditors, closing the school bus reckless driving loophole, and helping get the Route 1 transit study funded.

Surovell said he quickly learned "...to get things done in Richmond, you have to have friends on both sides of the aisle or you’re never going to get anything done."

Today, Surovell hopes District 44 voters send him back to the capital on Nov. 8. Some of the hot-button issues (he's got a running list of 75 to 80 proposals) Surovell hopes to continue to work on include:

  • Route 1 Transit Study: “It’s our hope that the study will bring some clarity to the Route 1 debate, on what it will look like: Metro, bus route, light rail?” said Surovell. “In Arlington, in Ballston, they did it.” He noted that possibly extending the Yellow Line down Route 1 is a “20- to 25-year discussion” and that widening the road could be a short-term answer.

Answering critics who say it’s time to do something right now about Route 1, Surovell noted: “I think the most important thing to know is it would be illegal to do anything to Route 1 without a transit study. This isn’t another study for the sake of doing a study. It’s the next step in order to do something to Route 1. There are a lot of people and governments [federal, state and local] with their fingers in this.”

  • Green initiatives: “Virginia doesn’t provide near the same tax benefits that surrounding states do for solar and geothermal improvements to homes, businesses or charities,” Surovell said. “I want to bring Virginia up to speed.”
    • Preschools: “My kids get four years of education before they get to kindergarten,” said Surovell. “The Fairfax County childcare services waiting list has 3,000 children on it. The state needs to step up to the plate. The county should also step up to the plate… I would hope educating children who don’t have the same opportunities as other kids would be a priority.”

    For Scott Anthony Surovell, serving the 44th District has always been a family affair. Some of those top initiatives—helping fix Route 1, adding more preschools and helping consumers take advantage of green initiatives, come second nature to him, considering his upbringing.

    The 40 year-old husband and father of four lives in the historic Tauxemont neighborhood, a woodsy enclave off of Fort Hunt Road where he grew up one of two children of dad Robert, a lawyer, and mom Glenda, an environmentalist.

    The neighborhood was founded by a group of determined idealists that included Surovell’s grandparents, Sam and Flossie Surovell. They banded together with a group of 19 other families and founded the Tauxemont neighborhood in the '40s, buying the land and building the homes in a cooperative. Earlier, Sam Surovell was a muralist for the Works Progress Administration and later started his own engraving business.

    Surovell’s grandparents at first were shunned by Virginia Democrats in the ‘30s, when they first moved to the area and lived on then-unpaved Gallows Road in Fairfax County, according to their grandson. “They were Jews from Brooklyn—the Democratic Party would have nothing to do with them,” Surovell said recently, in between sips of a Diet Coke at his campaign headquarters off of Route 1.

    Today, Surovell’s children attend the preschool his grandparents helped build in the Tauxemont community. Surovell is married to Erinn Madden, a tax attorney. "She's a saint and puts up with me," he said. The two, married for 11 years, are raising their four children Eva, 10, Leia, 9, Mara, 6 and Colin, 5, who stay busy playing soccer and taking ballet lessons, piano and gymnastics.

    Part of the first class at West Potomac High School, Surovell graduated from James Madison University with a degree in political science, and then earned a law degree from the University of Virginia. Today Surovell is a partner with his father at Surovell, Isaacs, Petersen & Levy in Fairfax.

    After college and before embarking on his career, a college buddy asked Surovell to ride in a cross-country bicycle road trip with him. At first Surovell thought he'd pass. But then, he decided to take him up on the offer and the two road their bicycles from Oregon to Virginia Beach in 46 days. 

    “I felt like if I could pull that off,” he said, “I could accomplish anything.”

    Related Topics: 44th House District, Route 1, and Scott Surovell

    capitol5555

    10:10 am on Wednesday, September 28, 2011

    Another "study" for the Route 1 corridor, just another duplicate expense at the taxpayers expense.
    Also, on another topic, is part of Fort Hunt Rd. going to be resurfaced? The section north of the Hollin Hall Safeway up to Fordson Rd. Surovell's office says "NO" while Hyland's office says "YES". Fort Hunt Rd. is in dire need of being resurfaced; no more pot hole repairs.

    Reply

    DAVE

    10:34 am on Wednesday, September 28, 2011

    More money, more money, more money. I've said for years that selected parts of Route 1 need to be bulldozed from the Beltway to Fort Belvoir and re-established into a cohesive business idea.. Capitol5555, what they'll do is spend thousands of dollars resurfacing it right before they start a massive construction project, i.e. Old Mt Vernon Highway.

    Reply

    Scott Surovell

    11:24 am on Wednesday, September 28, 2011

    Hi Capitol5555:

    As I explained in the article, the state is prohibited by federal law from widening US 1 and adding bus pulloffs without a transit study. Without the U.S. 1 Transit Study it would be **illegal** to widen U.S. 1.

    I understand your frustration about the number of studies that have been done, but none of them focused on the appropriate transit options for the corridor in a way that would satisfy the requirements of federal law. When I asked VDOT what I needed to do to get U.S. 1 widened, I was told this was the first step.

    I'm please we were able to secure it with the help of the McDonnell Administration twelve months after I was elected.

    In terms of the paving of Fort Hunt Road, I have writtten about this repeatedly in my columns and on my blog. VDOT recently advised that they have added Fort Hunt Road to the paving schedule. They were originally going to repave a better part of it first, but Supervisor Hyland has been working with them to see that the worst section is addressed first. I believe paving will start in the next six months. If you would like a more accurate date, please email me and I will get it for you.

    Please note that all of U.S. 1 was repaved last years.

    VDOT advises me that 25% of lane miles in Fairfax County have deficient pavement quality. That number is growing each year due to the state's transportation funding shortfall. Until we get more revenue in the system, we will all be paying for more wheel alignments.

    Reply

    capitol5555

    11:39 am on Wednesday, September 28, 2011

    Delegate Surovell,
    Thanks for your response. I was told by Gerry Hyland's office that the resurfacing of Ft. Hunt Road would take place in June of 2011!! Wish both of you were on the same page. I agree with DAVE's assesment written within the comments of this article regarding the Route 1 corridor. Also, in my opinion, there is a definite increase in crime on the Route 1 corridor. I have a family member who was a vicitm of a crime around the Hybla Valley area a few years ago.

    Reply

    Scott Surovell

    12:42 pm on Wednesday, September 28, 2011

    Yeah, I'm not surprised. There are a million needs and a shrinking pie to pay for it. I've got a call in to VDOT to get the date paving will start.

    As for U.S. 1, I've written a ton here:

    http://scottsurovell.blogspot.com/search/label/U.S.%201%20Redevelopment

    Beyond that, what's mainly holding back U.S. 1 redevelopment is lack of investment in the transportation infrastructure. Due to 50,000 new people in Lorton over the last 10 years, it's now gridlocked and properties are stranded. If you can show me another 12-acre parcel (Multiplex) on a 6-lane highway that sat unused for 5 years in Fairfax County, I'd like to know where that is.

    We should be benefiting from BRAC with new jobs and office buildings, but we're not - they're going to Springfield.

    The key to U.S. 1 redevelopment is getting U.S. 1 widened and getting the Yellow Line extended from Huntington down U.S. 1 to Lorton. The first legally required step to do that is the Route 1 Transit Study.

    The northern end of U.S. 1 runs between two exits on the largest highway on the East Coast with a Metro Station in between. Beacon Hill over looks the U.S. Capitol, the Washington Catherdal, and has a 200-degree view of the Potomac River. Commercial space in Eisenhower Valley rents for $5/SF more than Tyson's Corner.

    Our community has assets. They simply need help in the form of better infrastructure to be utilized. That is my focus.

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    T Ailshire

    8:25 pm on Wednesday, September 28, 2011

    I hope the "study" remains objective. Everything I've seen so far is calling for increased density along the US1 corridor *before* anything gets done about transportation. US1 has hundreds of businesses that do great jobs, but it does *not* have sufficient traffic enforcement or pedestrian-friendly intersections or elevated crossings. Many people argue it needs "redevelopment," which seems to mean "make it look like Tysons Corner or Ballston, with people living literally atop one another.

    And why has Maryland (Rd?) near Mt. Vernon high school been paved TWICE in the 8 years I've lived here.

    Scott Surovell

    3:22 pm on Wednesday, September 28, 2011

    Capitol5555:

    I'm told that the paving of Fort Hunt Road will start no sooner than Friday of this week and no later than 10/7 and that the contractor will pave Fort Hunt from Quander Road to Sherwood Hall Lane first and then pave U.S. 1 to Hunting Cove Place. I'll also post this on my blog.

    Reply

    DAVE

    9:43 am on Thursday, September 29, 2011

    It is actually Maryland Street and I live on it. For better (and in my opinion worse) a cut through between 623 and Mt Vernon Highway. The street handles 5 times the traffic it was intended to. I've lived on Maryland Street for 6 years and have only seen it paved once. When I hear people on Old Mill Rd. complain about speed I laugh because Maryland Street is a quarter mile drag strip that Old Mill Road can't touch. My wife actually tried to have speed humps or bumps put in but found the process to be so cumbersome as to not be worthwhile.

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    T Ailshire

    7:42 pm on Wednesday, October 5, 2011

    I've seen it paved twice in 8 years, so perhaps just before you bought.

    It would also help to have some enforcement of parking on that street; people park willy-nilly, disregarding the "park in the direction of traffic" law. No parking should be allowed on the side opposite the school; it's too dangerous.

    Comment_arrow

    DAVE

    6:44 am on Thursday, October 6, 2011

    I live right on Maryland between Braddock and Custis and more than once has the street in front of my yard been used as a parking lot and trashcan.. It got so bad I contacted Ms. King at MVHS and said I would file a complaint with the county if something wasn't done. We've tried to get speed bumps/humps in an effort to slow traffic between MVHwy and Riverside Estates. Unfortunately, it required a "study" and enough paperwork to kill a forest. Once a child gets killed everyone will do what they always do, point fingers and pass the buck.

    DAVE

    10:55 am on Thursday, September 29, 2011

    I'd like to know how every square inch of land in the Mt Vernon/Hybla Valley Corridor was built on with someone in the county or state going "hmmmmm maybe we ought to think about how we're going to get all these vehicles from the Beltway to Belvoir in under 45 minutes?" We've recently heard all our state and federal representatives saying BRAC is the reasson for this debacle. BRAc is not and has never been the issue. The lack of foresight and the ludicrous studies are the issue. Now that it's an issue everybody's on board with fixing it. What's the five year plan to fix this issue? And please don't say studies, those are the 10-15 year plan and Metro is the 25 year plan. And if there is no solid 5 year plan in place not a single home/business should be built.

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    Scott Surovell

    10:48 pm on Thursday, September 29, 2011

    Dave:

    I've never blamed BRAC for the existing gridlock on U.S. 1. Things got really bad when Lorton grew by 50,000 people. Growth without improved transportation facilities caused it.

    Also, population growth my delegate seat (the Mt. Vernon area) exceeded Fairfax County's growth rate without the construction of any significant new housing - it grew because of repopulation of the area with families with children - that's why every school in my seat now has trailers.

    Unfortunately, transportation planning does not work on five-year cycles. It works on six and twelve year cycles. When no projects for U.S. 1 were proposed for VDOT's Six Year Improvement Plan, I was one of two legislators who appeared at the public hearing and demanded changes. I also organized a petition signed by nearly 1,000 Mount Vernon and Lee District residents.

    You can sign my petition and watch my speech here - www.bit.ly/route1petition

    The Board's failure to give us a fair shake is one more reason that we need to change the composition of the Commonwealth Transportation Board. That's why I introduced this legislation currently being considered by Governor McDonnell's Government Reform Commission:

    http://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?111+sum+HB1801

    Thanks!

    Marta D. Saltus

    11:20 am on Thursday, September 29, 2011

    I have to agree with Dave, "studies" will not resolve the traffic and congestion issues on Rte. 1! These studies should have been conducted years ago, prior to BRAC's implemention 2 weeks ago. It is too little, too late now to claim that a transit study is the solution voters are looking for.

    Reply

    Scott Surovell

    10:42 pm on Thursday, September 29, 2011

    Marta:

    Thanks for your comment. As is written in the article and my comment above - it is illegal to widen U.S. 1 without conducting a transit study. This is Federal Law. The Federal Government isn't going to change the law for our 7 mile stretch of road.

    While I recognize some people might not like the idea of conducting a study to ensure that if we invest transit facilities people might actually use them it is legal reality so that we do not squander our scarce tax dollars foolishly.

    If someone has a solution that does not involve widening U.S. 1 or building some form of transit, I'd like to hear what it is. It would have to basically take 10,000 of 50,000 cars per day off Route 1.

    Anyone can send me an email at scottsurovell@gmail.com with their solutions or post them here. Thanks!

    Reply

    Marta D. Saltus

    11:28 am on Friday, September 30, 2011

    Scott: as a federal civilian I'm quite aware of the requirement for a study. The issue in question here is the timing! Any studies that are/were required by law should have hapened years ago, not now, when the congestion and BRAC 133 is upon us. 5000 employees will be moving to the Mark Center by the end of year. BRAC 133 impacts Ft. Belvoir and Mark center, as the locations where all personnel affected are being transferred to. Too little, too late being done by our current elected officials, including you.

    Reply

    George S

    11:44 am on Friday, September 30, 2011

    I'm confused Marta- Surovell should have done this study years ago?....when he wasn't an elected official? If you're saying he should have run for office before 2009, I agree with you.

    I also agree that the study should have been done earlier, but it wasn't. What's the alternative to doing the study now?

    Reply

    DAVE

    6:58 am on Thursday, October 6, 2011

    I don't blame Mr. Surovell for the transportation issue on Route 1. I blame all our local government officials for allowing the continued development of Route 1 without the infrastructure to support it. Reality is Metro will never run from Huntington south in our lifetimes. Everyone in favor of tying up Route 1 for 5-7 years while it's built raise their hands. On a Saturday it takes 15 minutes to get to Walmart from MVhwy.

    Reply

    Sammy

    5:19 pm on Thursday, October 6, 2011

    Try traveling south on Rt 1 anytime after 3pm now.....tell me BRAC isn't responsible for the back from Lukens to the Parkway....

    Reply

    Marta D. Saltus

    5:33 pm on Thursday, October 6, 2011

    It took me 40 min at 4:00 to go from Woodlawn past the post to take the parkway. Wait until 6000 more move in by end of year!

    Reply

    DAVE

    6:45 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

    I think the thing that concerns me most is the fact that by Mr. Surovell's own admission "none of them (studies) focused on the appropriate transit options for the corridor in a way that would satisfy the requirements of federal law. When I asked VDOT what I needed to do to get U.S. 1 widened, I was told this was the first step" By this statement I take it there have been numerous studies, at taxpayer expense I might add, resulting in nothing but lip service and more traffic.

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    Scott Surovell

    8:30 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

    Dave

    Most of those studies were done by Fairfax County to study appropriate land use planning.

    One study - the Route 1 Centerline Study - was also required to widen the road, but it highlighted the federal requirement for the transit study. It was authorized by Senator Puller's legislation in 1993 and not completed until 2009 (completed for the entire corridor minus US 1 from Alexandria to Woodlawn). You can read it here:

    http://bit.ly/route1centerlinestudy

    The reality of transportation is that proper road planning is integrated with land use planning as well. I think that planners are finally catching up to that reality.

    The prior studies had value. Their only shortcoming is that they did not focus on modes of transit and make a judgment about exactly which mode would work from a land use, engineering and cost perspective. At the end of the day, these are very complex issues that involved federal-state-local concerns, plus require input from the community and businesses and potentially affect thousands of people.

    I can understand the frustration, but we are moving the ball forward.

    Marta D. Saltus

    7:32 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

    Amen! All lip service at taxpayers expense, no solutions, and aggravated gridlock as days go by. We need new leadership that will actually take action to resolve the congestion problem, not just talk about what could or should be done!

    Reply

    DAVE

    9:11 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

    Scott in no way am I blaming you for the problems with Route 1. It was a problem long before you were elected and will be a problem long after you're gone. This isn't a Democrat or Republican issue as neither party is going to be able to singlehandedly solve the problem. I refuse to go on Route 1 any time of the day or night and might travel it once a month if my son has practice near Beacon Hill. Otherwise, I find different Routes. I also agree with your transportation reality, but hindsight is 20/20 and moving forward, residential and business development along Rte 1 should be quashed (including Costco), until a comprehensive transportation plan for the corridor can be reached. Start turning new businesses away and see how fast the state and county get the asphalt here.

    Reply

    capitol5555

    9:20 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

    Study, lip service, study, lip service, on and on. Someone needs to take the "bull by the horns" and at least come up with some short term immediate solutions. I am sure all of our over paid county staff should be able to come up with some plans, that is what they are paid to do!!!!

    Some of the withered and delapidated buildings are in a horrible condition, Does anyone with in the county enforce the zoning/building codes?

    Reply

    capitol5555

    10:04 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

    Also, factor in the crime issue. Without having access to county's crime stats, it is safe to say that crime is on the upswing; especially armed robberies of individuals and merchants. We no longer frequent Route 1 establishments during the evening hours. Finally, traffic enforcement of jaywalkers is necessary.

    Reply

    Leave a comment